Why ‘The Fighter’ fails to live up to the classics of past Indian war films
a recently watched movies warrior Many enthusiasts wondered if Bollywood was going to stop covering serious themes like war. Hrithik Roshan and Deepika Padukone’s performances seem more blunt. They try hard, but they can’t make a convincing appearance as soldiers. The script is full of flaws and ends up being a mess. The war scenes are not appealing at all.There is no attempt to make a realistic war movie like Evergreen. Ham Dono and hakey cut.
The issue of war is not a trivial issue. In the background 50 years ago, hindustan ki kasamnarrated in the voice of writer, director, and actor Chetan Anand.Ladai mein kabu kis ka jeet hota hai.Akhil Har Hai Hoti Hai” These are words that no other film director dared to reveal. hindustan ki kasam, the first Indian film about air combat, was not a classic. Still, the dog fights were real and the performances and music were unforgettable. The continuity after that is Vijeta A decade later, the films directed by director Govind Nihalani were memorable but not comparable. hindustan ki kasam.
The problem with Indian war films is that most directors have no vision or knowledge of the lives of soldiers, the context of battles and how they are involved. JP Dutta could have given a big hit as well as Border. His masterpiece, LOC, was not very successful. It looks like a damp squib when compared to Haqeeqat (1964). Even today, a majority of defense officials agree that ‘Haqeeqat’ is the best war film of international standards ever produced by India.General Jayanta Chaudhary and Field Marshal Sam Manekshaw also praised the hakey cut.
Uri~It’s true that “Surgical Strike” was a better movie than “The Fighter.” But what it lacked was the true emotion of the combat backdrop. Best of all, the political scenario behind each war is never touched on. Neville Maxwell’s famous book India’s China War, which was banned by the then Congress government in the 60s, proves that the 1962 Sino-Indian conflict was not just an all-out Chinese invasion. It reveals many facts. India also had many shortcomings.This is the biggest drawback of the classic hakey cut He has a Nehruvian socialist ideology.
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army looked ridiculous and wasn’t drawn properly. The Bhutanese and Ladakh rulers who acted as Chinese soldiers failed to rise to the occasion. A scene in which a Chinese soldier opens a watch on the corpse of an Indian infantryman is certainly not something a brave man like Chetan Anand would have asked for in a classic.
Indian films cannot be compared to European or Hollywood war classics. They are much better researched, pinpointed, properly installed, and better made. “What a waste of good infantry,” says General George Patton (George C. Scott) in the film. Patton (1970). He praised the efforts of Field Marshal Erwin Rommel, who led a large army that was defeated by the Allied forces due to his misguided ambitions in a desperate effort to conquer power. Only soldiers can understand their opponents, even if they are the enemy.
In this respect, Chetan Anand never made Pakistani soldiers look ridiculous. hindustan ki kasam. Sure, this was a stylized fiction film about his 1971 air battle, but it had some memorable moments. Who can forget Pakistan Air Force officer Bharat Kapoor (Usman) hugging his aunt (Bina) and saying,Karajaan aaj ami ki yaad taza ho gayee.Birkul Wohi Shakal” There were real tears in Bharat Kapoor’s eyes, and they weren’t made by glycerin.
Going back to the fighters, you can’t forget that even if the show is on. Mediocre movies like this disturb people’s senses. War is not just about heroism and chivalry. Behind each battle and war is a great tragedy and countless tears. Ironically, the typical pot filmmaker rakes in the money at the expense of false propaganda and artificial sentiment. When will this stop?
